Closed Thread
mod_clockers
Old 01-16-2005, 03:21 PM mod_clockers
A teammate's Avatar
Experienced Talker

Posts: 33
Hi!
This site is going to be about computer modification and overclocking. The site is in Swedish.

Thx in advance for reviewing my site!
A teammate is offline
View Public Profile
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 01-19-2005, 05:26 AM site
karmatosed's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 52
Location: geddington, UK
I think that as a format and initial design works well but personally it needs some tieing together and work. I suggest a few things - the logo needs to be redone and brought up to date.
Main problem I have is without content finding it hard to see what structure there is to site so can only comment on format.
Think maybe you should fill the whole white rectangle with the site though if that is something hosting is restricting you to.
karmatosed is offline
View Public Profile Visit karmatosed's homepage!
 
Old 01-19-2005, 07:54 AM
pixelputty's Avatar
Webmaster Talker

Posts: 648
I don`t like the header, IMHO it loove weak and cheap, can`t say much about the rest until it`s HTML, but the layout seems to be fine, good luck.
__________________
Click here to visit the UFO Portal
The truth is out there!
pixelputty is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 01-19-2005, 05:19 PM
Kaiman's Avatar
Extreme Talker

Posts: 237
I think that the format and basic design that are in the picture work fine. Its hard to give you a honest critique without being able to look at the site in different browsers and see your source code. If you do get it to that point I would love to review it.

Kaiman

Storm King Design
Kaiman is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 01-23-2005, 02:00 AM
Novice Talker

Posts: 9
1. I agree that you need to workout on the header/banner. Maybe gather some images or symbols for overclocking and design a site logo if you want. You could do lots of stuffs, an example would be a manipulated mobo picture.
2. You may want to add more images in the white spaces. ^^
3. Add more features I guess. Because if you really dont have any other feature to put, you should have put a forum/board rather than a web page. ^_^

Keep up the good work. ^_^
ionicwings is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 01-23-2005, 04:33 AM
montel's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 59
I think that you really rushed the layout and the initial design. First i would re-layout the layout. Next try and get someone to assist you with the graphics im sure someone is willing to help. Other than that the layout seems simple and the navigation is easy to access
__________________
Dope = dopepage.com = webdesign = Dope page
montel is offline
View Public Profile
 
Old 01-23-2005, 07:36 AM
dojo's Avatar
Ultra Talker

Latest Blog Post:
Keep an eye on that budget!
Posts: 296
Location: Romania
This kind of layout is kinda overused these days. In order to make it catchy try to make it more "colourful". The grey is OK (I've got a fixation with it ), but make the links orange or red so that it gets a life
The banner is to faded. Use some images, blend them, put a catchy logo and you'll be OK.
If you remain with the grey backround, make sure you get rid of the white page background. It looks too contrasting.
Make use of some fonts. There are some quite nice for the theme (you can use them for headers, logo and so on. In images so that the browser won't have problems)
__________________
Wtricks.com - webmaster tutorials, articles, community, links, blog and free downloads
Romanian webmaster forums
dojo is offline
View Public Profile Visit dojo's homepage!
 
Closed Thread     « Reply to mod_clockers
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Webmaster Resources Marketplace:
Software Development Company | Webhosting.UK.com | Text Link Brokers 


   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.13439 seconds with 12 queries