Reply
Old 09-03-2009, 07:08 AM review needed
Average Talker

Posts: 17
Location: US
Trades: 0
have a look at http://www.bitwords.com
i think it is very attractive and unique what do you think???
mint1 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 09-03-2009, 08:44 AM Re: review needed
Average Talker

Posts: 20
Name: Mark England
Trades: 0
I like it. A LOT.

Nice clean design. Very clinical. Clear information.
markg100 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit markg100's homepage!
 
Old 09-08-2009, 04:14 PM Re: review needed
Average Talker

Posts: 25
Name: Brad Johnson
Location: US
Trades: 0
Nice site ! It looks very decent, and the color used is quite sober. But the heading of the paragraphs are of the same lighter color as the header, and it should be changed to a deeper tone.
__________________
Brad::Forex
bradj1683 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit bradj1683's homepage!
 
Old 09-08-2009, 04:17 PM Re: review needed
Douglife's Avatar
Super Talker

Posts: 121
Name: Douglas Montgomery
Location: Florida
Trades: 0
I wouldn't change a bit. I have a friend near me with some experience, he viewed it for about 6 seconds and mentioned how well laid out, and placed. Good work!
Douglife is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit Douglife's homepage!
 
Old 09-09-2009, 02:16 AM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 6
Name: teddy
Trades: 0
Wow nice, I like the icons and use of orange.
ninjacow is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-26-2009, 06:51 AM Review:Bitwords.com
Average Talker

Posts: 17
Location: US
Trades: 0
We have updated site of a Bitwords Media, well known web development company. What do you think about its color scheme, performance and over all experience etc.
Have a look at our web design and <same as in first post>

Last edited by chrishirst; 10-26-2009 at 08:01 AM.. Reason: keyworded link removed
mint1 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-26-2009, 02:41 PM Re: review needed
bige2533's Avatar
Experienced Talker

Posts: 40
Name: Eric
Location: Colorado
Trades: 0
Rating: 8.5

Appearance: Nice clean feel to it. Definitely looks like a corporate site. Good layout. I’m not a fan of the Orange color for the headers. The logo is a good design but it looks more like bn than bm.

Functionality: Navigation and links work. The site is fast. I like the scroller you’ve used. The portfolio page loads strange for IE6 (slow and clumsy) but you have good examples.

Overall & Content: The purpose and appearance of the site match. Good balance between design and development. What I mean is you don’t go overboard on the graphics on your own page but your portfolio shows creativity.

Technical: The grammar is lacking in some paragraphs. You may want to have it proofread.
__________________
Oval Trail Stickers
bige2533 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-26-2009, 06:59 PM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 11
Name: Jane Yardy
Trades: 0
Very great theme but you can improve it more by optimizing it little...
janeyardy is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-26-2009, 09:34 PM Re: review needed
Experienced Talker

Posts: 40
Trades: 0
Its a nice and clean design,very professional
__________________
Registry cleaner | Make Computer Faster
Jason12345 is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 10-28-2009, 08:20 PM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 10
Name: Andy
Trades: 0
I like flash header of your website it is looking cool...
serer is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 11-02-2009, 01:46 PM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 12
Trades: 0
I think that the design seems very complete and nice to look at.
Your main banner is really good, but to put a finger on something, it would make the design better if the design of your online chat window matched the design on your page.
Lindkvist is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 11-02-2009, 11:20 PM Re: review needed
RobK's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 56
Name: Robert
Location: TianJin, China
Trades: 1
I like the overall design, the color scheme is not very common making the site easier to remember but still looks quite simple and stylish.

Great job overall.
__________________
Freelance Designer available for hire www.rlkdesigns.com
Check out my work and please let me know what you think.
RobK is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit RobK's homepage!
 
Old 11-03-2009, 12:52 AM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 6
Trades: 0
Simple and professional. It shows confidence in what you do. However it needs something I just can't put my finger on, to stand out from the trillion other sites that look just like it. Something unique or catchy to make them remember you.

Just a thought.
__________________
Earn Up To 25% Commissions With Personalized Letters From Santa Claus. Sign Up Now. Weekly Payments.
jinglebells is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit jinglebells's homepage!
 
Old 11-03-2009, 12:59 AM Re: review needed
Novice Talker

Posts: 10
Trades: 0
Well about the design it is pretty good. looks nice, and composed. But on thing I would say is that the picture you used in your header, has a poor quality. The pixels are visible, and it makes the appearance dull.
__________________
Bokashi
Solar Panels
jsmart7 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 11-03-2009, 01:10 AM Re: review needed
Skilled Talker

Posts: 91
Name: Sidney shieldon
Trades: 0
So you are also "hiring" thats good. The website is good mate..
__________________
www.gametag.com
infotech rules is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to review needed
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 



Page generated in 0.16645 seconds with 13 queries