Reply
spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
Old 06-01-2008, 03:24 AM spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
Experienced Talker

Posts: 43
Hi all,

I have a favor to ask you. Please let me know which site you like better:

www.spicyicy.com

or

www.spicyoricy.com


I am in need to determine the future direction of my community site.

tns,
TeknoRhino
teknorhino is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 06-02-2008, 04:17 PM Re: spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
g0hwc.com's Avatar
Experienced Talker

Posts: 33
Name: Paul Young
Location: Clacton on Sea, Essex, England
Hi,

the top one looked best to me but took a while to load

bottom one a bit basic looking but seemed a lot quicker


Paul
__________________
Check out my hobbie site
http://www.g0hwc.com
g0hwc.com is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit g0hwc.com's homepage!
 
Old 06-02-2008, 04:35 PM Re: spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
highanddry's Avatar
Close Talker

Posts: 876
Name: Jacob
#1 is better because #2 is too much like "hotornot"

Last edited by highanddry : 06-02-2008 at 04:36 PM.
highanddry is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 06-03-2008, 05:32 AM Re: spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
arcel's Avatar
Patron St. of Lost Causes

Posts: 1,191
Name: arcel
i'll pick the first one but it takes time to load unlike the second one.
the first one looks more organize.
__________________
arcel is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit arcel's homepage!
 
Reply     « Reply to spicyicy.com versus spicyoricy.com
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Webmaster Resources Marketplace:
Software Development Company | Webhosting.UK.com | Text Link Brokers 


   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.11758 seconds with 12 queries