In order by the amount of traffic they send, at least according to awstats:
- Google (Images)
- Google
- Stumbleupon (Social Bookmark)
- Yahoo!
- MSN Search
- Windows Live
- Unknown search engines
- AOL
- Google (Groups)
- Dogpile
- Ask
- Google (cache)
- Blingo
- AltaVista
- Netscape
- A9
- InfoSpace
- Earth Link
- AT&T search (powered by Google)
- WebCrawler
- Excite
- MyWebSearch
I'm not sure why InfoSpace and EarthLink are the only engines that don't get links, but a more important question is probably why Microsoft's search engines are broken out onto two lines? Yahoo still wins if you combine them.
It's interesting that Stumble is considered a search engine; this is the "
Links from an Internet Search Engine" report. They're building a huge database and getting free labor to call it "human edited," so I could see them moving in that direction ... but I'd guess half the pages and reviews are conflicts of interest. Photos tend to do pretty well on Stumble, though, so in the eyes of at least one open source project, it's the #2 search engine to Google, for my traffic. Even if it's more of a "show me a random site" application than a
search engine.
People are constantly talking about submitting to search engines; I didn't submit to any of these 22 that have sent me traffic this month. With a little bit of patience, they all found me, organically, and send traffic.
So, there really isn't any point to this posting, except that I was a little shocked to see that InfoSpace, AltaVista, and Netscape are still in business. I would same the same thing about Excite, but I have a throw-away email address with them, everyone told me I was SOL when they went bankrupt, but nothing actually changed. On the other hand, if you add the Googles together, they outweigh everything else combined by at least ten to one.