Reply
Effective CPM - Cost per 1000 impressions
Old 09-07-2004, 12:08 AM Effective CPM - Cost per 1000 impressions
Ellicit's Avatar
Average Talker

Posts: 27
What does this mean..?
IS this something new to Google Advertising Network?
i not showing much profit from this system.?

wasn't it Cost Per Click before?
__________________

Thank you.

Last edited by Ellicit : 09-07-2004 at 12:10 AM.
Ellicit is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit Ellicit's homepage!
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 09-07-2004, 04:20 AM
Average Talker

Posts: 29
Well Google describes it as:

Quote:
Effective CPM - Cost per 1000 impressions. From a publisher's perspective, CPM is a useful way to compare revenue across different channels and advertising programs. It is calculated by dividing total earnings by the number of impressions in thousands. For example, if a publisher earned $180 from 45,000 impressions, the CPM would equal $180/45, or $4.00.
survivorshrine is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 09-08-2004, 12:59 PM
Experienced Talker

Posts: 33
Google advertising network is CPC program.

eCPM is used in some network like fastclick, mamma.com.
baggiho is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit baggiho's homepage!
 
Old 05-12-2006, 02:43 AM Re: Effective CPM - Cost per 1000 impressions
desktoparena's Avatar
Average Talker

Posts: 20
Location: Canada
Why it is going down?
__________________
Daily Diet for your Desktop...
www.DesktopArena.com
www.MastiNetwork.com
desktoparena is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit desktoparena's homepage!
 
Reply     « Reply to Effective CPM - Cost per 1000 impressions
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.13189 seconds with 12 queries