Reply
Geotarget worth the bother?
Old 12-12-2007, 01:42 PM Geotarget worth the bother?
Webmaster Talker

Posts: 551
Name: Barry O' Brien
Location: Ireland
Geotarget worth the bother? is it worth the bother to use the geotarget feature in the google webmaster tools? my site was not set to any there is two options not geotarget and geotargeted none of these where picked it was at a default mode.
audiomad is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit audiomad's homepage!
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 12-12-2007, 04:45 PM Re: Geotarget worth the bother?
chrishirst's Avatar
Super Moderator

Latest Blog Post:
Javascript alert
Posts: 13,688
Location: Blackpool. UK
probably not, it will only affect ONE search engine. Much better to use your own site pages to geotarget so ALL search engines get the same options.
__________________
Chris. ->> Links are advertising NOT optimising!! <<-
Indifference will be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?
Code Samples | People Counting System
chrishirst is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit chrishirst's homepage!
 
Old 12-12-2007, 06:15 PM Re: Geotarget worth the bother?
alan1961's Avatar
Skilled Talker

Posts: 62
Name: Alan
Location: Ayr, Scotland
I dont know if it will make any difference. My understanding is that Google already attempts to target geogrphically based on the tld, so a .uk domain will be targeted towards the UK, .ie for Ireland, and so on. If this is correct then what happens to .com, .org, and so on, or even the European .eu?
__________________
ahb Solutions
alan1961 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to Geotarget worth the bother?
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.12529 seconds with 12 queries