 |
|
06-07-2007, 04:51 AM
|
Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 354
|
Hi All, I want to just know your comments & suggestion on alexa ranking. My question is "How I can increase my alexa ranking" ?
Please describe all the factors which may be helpful to increasing my alexa ranks?
Waiting for your suggestions or views.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 05:00 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 208
|
What do you want from Alexa traffic? I thi k that man nothing.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 06:43 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 1,004
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sck4784
Please describe all the factors which may be helpful to increasing my alexa ranks?
|
The fact that you can increase your alexa rank by visiting your own site might give an indication of this metric's usefulness.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 09:27 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 42
Name: David Cronk
|
Yeah I tend to think an Alexa Ranking is next to useless
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 03:43 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 5,523
Name: John Alexander
|
A better question that how, why would you want to change your Alexa ranking? You're probably the only one who's looked at it.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 06:58 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 52
|
My understanding is that Alexa only track the page view if the viewer has Alexa toolbar installed. It doesn't track the page view from any other source without Alexa toolbar.
Is that correct?
If that is the case, I guess only less than 20% of internet user have Alexa toolbar installed. Then there is no meaningful of Alexa page ranking.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 07:28 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 5,523
Name: John Alexander
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FindMyPages
If that is the case, I guess only less than 20% of internet user have Alexa toolbar installed. Then there is no meaningful of Alexa page ranking.
|
I have no idea what %, but my gut tells me 20 is too high. But let's pretend it's 20 % for the sake of discussion. That 1/5 of the internet using population. So they take the number of clicks you get, and multiply by five. Or if it's 10 % ie 1/10, they multiply by ten.
This is called statistical sampling. Only for this to give you any degree of accuracy, you either need a random sample, like Gallop attempts by dialing random phone numbers from a ( bad) list, or you need a targeted, pre-selected pool, like a focus group.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 07:38 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 52
|
Thank you so much leaning newbie....
That explain very well. I was thinking to implement Alexa redirect to some of my sites, but now I find it not very useful.
I was wondering why so many sites are asking for hire to write blog based on their Alexa page ranking.
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 08:34 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 5,945
Name: Adam for web page design, not program
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Where are you seeing these sites that are hiring blog writers based on Alexa page ranking anyway? I'm just curious; this is news to me (although I wouldn't be surprised if it were true, since people still think the Alexa metric is useful.)
|
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 08:48 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADAM Web Design
Where are you seeing these sites that are hiring blog writers based on Alexa page ranking anyway? I'm just curious; this is news to me (although I wouldn't be surprised if it were true, since people still think the Alexa metric is useful.)
|
I don't remember all of them. I tried to signed up some of them and got reject due to low Alexa page rank.
Here is one of the Blogger. See the giant icon saying "Hire me .. $130"?
http://andybeard.eu/
Here are the pay per post web site that you can earn $$ by writing articles.
https://payperpost.com/
I also tried to signed up some ad publisher site. I got reject as well, because my site has low traffic.
I am just not sure if they do make good $$ for living. How many words you have type a day to earn $130?
|
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 02:53 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 3,024
Name: Forrest Croce
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FindMyPages
I am just not sure if they do make good $$ for living. How many words you have type a day to earn $130?
|
One if you're a lawyer.
It depends on your market. Someone who's going to base purchasing decisions about the quality of writing on Alexa stats is probably going to be paying at the lower end of the spectrum. You need to find people who care about what's being said and your style of writing to shift the labor/payoff ratio in your direction.
|
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 01:57 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 5
Name: Jim
|
Alexa Ranking is just another tool you can use to measure your sites performance. I would not put a lot of weight on it, but its nice to have around.
|
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 04:10 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 180
Name: Sean
Location: Houston, TX
|
I think Alexa in interesting in terms of comparing your site to others, but don't find much value in it otherwise.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 12:45 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FindMyPages
Then there is no meaningful of Alexa page ranking.
|
It's still cited as one of the primary measuring sticks when it comes to purchasing expired domains with traffic. If it truly had no value at all, then it seems unlikely that so many sites would continue to list it, (as a key stat), front and center.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 02:07 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 8,935
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
People list it because there are others who think it has value. That doesn't mean it actually does have value, but rather people mistakenly think it does. People do stupid things. Just because a lot of people do the same stupid thing it doesn't make that thing smart.
What Alexa dies is in a way similar to using a sample to predict what the greater population might do or say. The problem with Alexa is that their user base isn't random. In order for a sample to be representative it needs to be random.
Alexa is mainly used by webmasters and SEOs and other tech people. Because of that it skews in favor of tech related sites. Webmaster-Talk as I'm looking now has an Alexa rank of 5,100. No offense to Tim, but I can guarantee there are more than 5,100 sites drawing more traffic than WT. But WT naturally attracts the kind of people who are more likely to have the Alexa Toolbar installed. WT is popular and I'm sure it gets a lot of traffic, but I'm sure Tim would agree the traffic Alexa says the site gets doesn't compare with what the site actually gets.
The very, very top Alexa ranked sites probably are the top visited sites though because the more popular the site the less the skewing will affect it. I think the top 3 sites are Yahoo, MSN, and Google in that order. All 3 are certainly among the top visited sites. The further you get from #1 though the more innacurate the numbers become.
One reason people might look at Alexa is because there are so few metrics we can really use to measure the worth of a site. That doesn't make the metric good. It just makes it available.
One way you probably can use Alexa reasonably is to look at trends in a site. Chances are if Alexa is showing more traffic to a site over time then the traffic to the site is probably growing. Same thing if the traffic is decreasing. But even that's not an absolute and you really can't trust the absolute numbers.
Alexa ranking is also easy to manipulate further reducing the usefulness of the numbers.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 02:47 AM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 3,024
Name: Forrest Croce
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vangogh
What Alexa dies [...]
|
Freudian slip?
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 07:37 PM
|
Re: Alexa Ranks
|
Posts: 8,935
Name: Steven Bradley
Location: Boulder, Colorado
|
Could be, though 'i' and 'o' are right next to each other on the keyboard and I'm renowned for being a horrible typist. I like that Freudian slip angle.
I don't mind Alexa, but I do wish people would stop thinking it's an important measure of the value of a site.
|
|
|
|
|