My head gets dizzy when I think about the work it would take to make 100,000 links around the world wide web. I think this would take a life-time unless I had an army of spammers.
My advise would be dont be in a rush to get loads of links to quick anyway as this is not a good tactic for getting good serps's, you should do directory and article directory submissions to get quantaty of links but then also link exchange and buy links to get high quality important page links. IMO
If you want to get more backlinks at a cheap price then you have to do
-Article writing at free submission sites.
-Directory submission at free submission sites.
-Forum posting at free submission sites.
-Trade linking.
-You can use various PPC sites(Pay Per Click sites) which charges low cost.
Getting backlinks from directory submission is cheapest, but backlinks from blog posts are best...
How can you make a blanket statement like that? If you're motivation is PR, is a backlink from a PR0 blog page better than a backlink from a PR7 'normal' page? If your goal is traffic, is a backlink from a dead blog better than a backlibk from an active forum? If your motivation is better ranking is a backlink from a mfa blog better than a backlink from a highly respected and 'authoritative' web site?
Blods are just web sites. They are not treated any differently than equivalent sites.
