I think Haimadan is thinking about the traditional html sitemap but the thread is actually about the XML Google sitemap.
I use them on all my sites and think they're just as important for small, quiet sites as for big busy sites.
I did a big sitemap rant when they first launched and nothing has changed my opinion since then, if anything the stats in that section of the Google site make it all the more relevant (although you can get the stats without a sitemap).
I use a sitemap on my directories so that Google know exactly where the new pages are - even though there may not be a homepage reference to them.
The same goes for articles on a CMS which needs to be indexed but isn't highlighted on the homepage or doesn't stay long enough to guarantee indexing.
|