Reply
.tk any good?
Old 03-10-2006, 06:22 AM .tk any good?
MGS
Junior Talker

Posts: 407
Hello,

What are people’s view about Dot TK domain names?

As you can register them for free how do people feel about them? Do you visit .tk domain names?

-MGS-
MGS is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit MGS's homepage!
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
     
Old 03-10-2006, 07:02 PM RE: .tk any good?
Junior Talker

Posts: 185
.tk used to be good, but it's now really a pretty ****ty service. the traffic check is never up, the ads are forced, it's like $50 a year for the paid domains, and they added splash pages. if the owner of the site doesn't care about their site enough to find a better (free or paid) service, they don't deserve the traffic.
PureEvil is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit PureEvil's homepage!
 
Old 03-12-2006, 03:40 AM RE: .tk any good?
Junior Talker

Posts: 3
whenever i see a .tk i know its some free hosted site
ilikechowfun is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 03-12-2006, 10:37 PM RE: .tk any good?
Junior Talker

Posts: 12
It's redirection more than a domain ,and BTW it sucks.
imported_mohab is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 03-13-2006, 04:18 PM RE: .tk any good?
Junior Talker

Posts: 96
I find generally people use .tk to redirect there webpages on a free hosting service so they have a more attractive domain name, for example instead of

http://www.prohosting.com/tromso

it would be

http://www.tromso.tk

.tk added a lot of ads, splashscreen etc so if you have extra $10 I would rather go get a .com
tromso is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to .tk any good?
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.11711 seconds with 13 queries