And if you write:
The fact is that this happens this way, this way, like this and this (describing the copied fact), as you can see it is described in plenty by www.originarysite.com?
Is also this a violation? If it is a violation of copiright you are violating the rights of the people who wrote the copyrights? Because you are reporting the words of the copyright in other words?!?!And what about adding "this information came from www.xxx.com"? or I took this information from www.xxx.com?
What about writing in a blog that there is a security issue in this web site, the security issue is -php, xxx,yyy,?>, and that it is possible to repair it like this: hh,sss,kkkff?>?...
Maybe somebody already knows about this security issue and they already wrote about this. They could have written that it's bad, they think it would be great the solutyon JJJJJ, but I also can find this security issue, find its details and find the solution and think the same good and bad things about the author of that post?
I would like to know whether also here a person is illegally acting or not.
If somebody writes that there is a good shop opened in Wild Street and they comment on the shop and its products, I cannot do the same because it has been already commented by somebody else? I will act illegally commenting this shop similarly to another person because "the law" thinks that I copied it and changed the sentences/words and maybe using synonyms?
I think there should be some kind of little freedom of word, otherwise before writing something we must check all the web whether there is already something similar???? |
