 |
|
09-19-2008, 05:44 PM
|
Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
Hey guys, are you allowed to use content from wikipedia without permission, as long as the you link to the original content?
|
|
|
|
09-19-2008, 06:29 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
|
No. You aren't required to link to the original content. You can simply take and do as you please.
Read the license first, if any media is attached. Check this history of the article (or resource of any kind) first. Look for instability, edit wars, and especially new additions that may not be properly licensed. And also for vandalism, which would embarrass you to print, but, mostly, because Wikipedia is public domain, and intended to be used as such, you should be careful of someone adding copyrighted material to an article 5 minutes before you pull down your copy. Theirs would be removed sooner than later in most cases, but unless you continue to check for updates, you wouldn't know it.
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008, 06:41 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
That's brilliant, thank you 
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008, 09:02 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 102
|
We can take help of wikipedia contents but we can not copy the contents of wiki.
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008, 04:25 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
Two contrasting points there, which one is correct?
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008, 06:42 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 267
Name: Lucas
|
I don't know about taking it without linking, it depends on Wikipedia's terms of use or terms of service.
But I do know that you can reprint ANYONE's content online if you provide a link. With the link everything becomes fair use.
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008, 08:28 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyef
But I do know that you can reprint ANYONE's content online if you provide a link. With the link everything becomes fair use.
|
SURELY that's not right... You mean I can just rip off anything from someone else's page, as long as I put a link that says "this is where the original can be found"?
|
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 12:18 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 267
Name: Lucas
|
That was my understanding, but I'm not a lawyer. Maybe I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 11:39 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 5
|
i learn a lot...
|
|
|
|
09-22-2008, 06:58 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
Can anyone else confirm this?
|
|
|
|
09-22-2008, 04:00 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
|
Using a link doesn't make something fair use. That's a common and utterly wrong myth. An urban legend. It's a case of wishful thinking, pure and simple. Spending 5 minutes of research ( real research, not browsing MFA sites written by people with no idea what they're advising about) will clear up all doubt.
Wikipedia content can be copied. In its entirety. You can copy the whole encyclopedia if you have enough gigabytes. As per their terms of service. The name "wikimedia commons" might provide a clue as well. Here's the first sentence from their about page
Further on down
Quote:
Trademarks and copyrights
Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation, which has created an entire family of free-content projects. On all of these projects, you are welcome to be bold and edit articles yourself, contributing knowledge as you see fit in a collaborative way.
All of the text in Wikipedia, and most of the images and other content, is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Contributions remain the property of their creators, while the GFDL license ensures the content is freely distributable and reproducible. (See the copyright notice and the content disclaimer for more information.)
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2008, 09:02 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 3
Name: Huego Varies
|
None of it is copywrited and it is all user generated so feel free to rip as much of it as you want. 
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 07:48 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 802
Location: UK... where else?
|
Yeah, I knew the comment "a link makes everything fair use" was not quite there lol
But still, that's good about wikipedia, cheers guys!
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 10:11 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 31
|
the lovely thing about wiki is that everything posted on it is fair game... including the images (which is really nice!)
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 11:19 AM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
|
Contributions remain the property of their creators
|
I never had any trouble with Wiki articles on my sites. Only twice I had an email from the author with the request to remove it. Which I did.
__________________
It's Never Too Late To Learn.
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 05:02 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Monkey
the lovely thing about wiki is that everything posted on it is fair game... including the images (which is really nice!)
|
Close. Most everything is fair game. Sometimes, people upload copyrighted images, text, and other media, which is taken down from Wikipedia. Usually within a few days. Everything that stays long term can be used, but just being on WP isn't a guarantee. You need to do the homework I outlined above.
Can anyone tell I do my share of editing on Wikipedia to improve the articles I'm interested in? 
|
|
|
|
10-21-2008, 09:12 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 94
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Why not ask directly the Wikipedia people?
|
|
|
|
10-23-2008, 02:26 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 3
Name: Jaqueline
|
Any writing you borrow from another author or source HAS to be cited, end of question. It doesn't matter whether it's wikipedia or a definition from a dictionary. Unless it's common knowledge. be on the safe side and site it. And don't plagiarize, it's just not fair to the original mind and it's creation
|
|
|
|
10-27-2008, 04:14 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thomsonbsa
Any writing you borrow from another author or source HAS to be cited, end of question. It doesn't matter whether it's wikipedia or a definition from a dictionary. Unless it's common knowledge. be on the safe side and site it. And don't plagiarize, it's just not fair to the original mind and it's creation
|
This is patently false.
Why do people lie to each other instead of spending 5 to 10 minutes learning? Look up the Wikipedia license. The question was about using text from Wikipedia, not from Uncle Joe's binge drinking blog, so we don't need to confuse people by guessing and generalizing about sources other than Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
10-28-2008, 05:04 PM
|
Re: Using Wikipedia Content
|
Posts: 3
Name: Joanna
|
Plagerism is plagerism. If it wasn't necessary to cite Wikipedia than why would they have a page with instructions on how to cite it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_Wikipedia . The rules apply to wikipedia that apply to all outside sources: give credit where credit is due. Don't steal ideas, concepts, or words. It's basic rules that you learn in third grade book reports.
|
|
|
|
|
« Reply to Using Wikipedia Content
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|