Reply
Active vs Passive Voice
Old 09-04-2008, 07:25 PM Active vs Passive Voice
Learning Newbie's Avatar
Defies a Status

Latest Blog Post:
Astounding Republican Paranoia
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
Trades: 0
How many people are familiar with the concept of active and passive voice? How many people have a preference or aversion?

Active voice describes a sentence built around a human actor doing something. Most languages in the world, and all new ones in the process of creation, have a subject verb object grammar. This is passive voice. Essentially, breaking this pattern means you could be veering into passive voice.

"John ate the cake" is active voice.
"The cake was eaten [by John]" is passive voice.

Most people (and some grammar checks) recommend almost always using active voice. This is anything but official, however. In science, generally, passive voice is the only option.

In science, God is not a satisfactory explanation, so we can't write "On the 4th day, God made the sun" and prefer "The sun was created when [not by] gravity coalesced dust into densely packed objects" and so on. Since it wasn't a person who caused a thing to happen to another thing, writing just describes what happened. Sometimes this is attributed to some type of cause - other times it isn't. Either are passive voice.



Which do you prefer? Which do you use more often?
Learning Newbie is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 09-04-2008, 11:54 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
francis84's Avatar
Ultra Talker

Posts: 465
Trades: 0
I had encounter such phrase or sentence like that...
But im not aware if its active o passive. Im still get confuse on it!
francis84 is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit francis84's homepage!
 
Old 09-06-2008, 06:34 AM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
TWD
TWD's Avatar
Webmaster Talker

Posts: 521
Trades: 0
We use passive voice in the following 3 situations.

1) We don`t know who did something.

ex. The report was submitted to me.
...sounds better than....
Some person submitted the report to me.

2) It`s not important who did something.

ex. The reports will be submitted tomorrow.
...sounds better than...
Our secretary will submit the reports tomorrow.

3) We want to soften some command or instruction.

ex. The reports must be submitted by 5 o`clock.
...sounds better than...
You must submit your reports by 5 o`clock.


Generally the passive voice comes across as more officious and impersonal

ex. Your business is appreciated by us.
...sounds much stuffier and bureaucratic than...
We appreciate your business.


Writing for web generally requires a more casual and conversational tone than print. The passive voice might be fine for an end of term paper for your history professor but on the internet you have to try harder to engage the reader since the next page is only a mouse click away and web surfers are notoriously fickle.

So try to avoid the passive voice for web content as much as you can.
TWD is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 09-06-2008, 03:29 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
Learning Newbie's Avatar
Defies a Status

Latest Blog Post:
Astounding Republican Paranoia
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
Trades: 0
Why do you think it's best to avoid passive voice when writing primarily for the web?

I'm curious, because rather than the end of a history term paper, the link I provided shows a survey of successful literature (Virginia Wolfe, etc) and comes to 82 % of the (successful) novels opening with a passive voice. There wasn't one example that could have actually been improved by rewriting for active voice.

My theory is that "avoid the passive voice" is a myth that's grown out of the grammar checker, and probably leads to the same sort of thing as their vs there. I think people can improve their writing by experimenting with at least some of the literary taboos - and that this is a particular example.
Learning Newbie is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 09-06-2008, 09:22 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
TWD
TWD's Avatar
Webmaster Talker

Posts: 521
Trades: 0
The point I was making is not about literature but specifically about writing for the web.

Of course the passive voice has its place in novels but on the web people are generally looking for concise "chunks" of information before moving on.
They are also looking for clarity and engagement. Not literary sophistication.

Passive voice sometimes leaves the reader confused about "who" is doing "what" to "whom" and as I mentioned, it sounds impersonal and less conversational than the active voice.
TWD is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 09-10-2008, 06:23 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
Learning Newbie's Avatar
Defies a Status

Latest Blog Post:
Astounding Republican Paranoia
Posts: 5,674
Name: John Alexander
Trades: 0
Fair, valid point. I write a blog, although I've fallen behind lately due to work demands. My blog is a collection of personal reflections, so, for me, there's no separation of literature and the web - it's just another medium. But, you're right, mileage will vary.
Learning Newbie is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 09-10-2008, 07:14 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
VirtuosiMedia's Avatar
Usability > SEO

Posts: 1,108
Trades: 0
I wrote this for a reply to another topic on a different forum, but it seems applicable here, so I'll just paste it in, if you don't mind. Some of my writing advice:

Audience

Understanding your audience is important to writing, just as it is to user interface design. You should know what lengths of writing work well for the attention span of your audience and you should vary your lengths from time to time. It's also vital to speak the same language. I'm not just talking about a spoken or written language like English or French; there are also cultural and sub-cultural contexts and euphemisms to which you need to pay attention. This will affect what content you produce and also how you present it. For instance, if your intended audience is pro-Linux, writing about Windows frequently isn't going to gain you a very large readership unless you are somehow also able to relate it to Linux.

Writing on the web is different than writing a book because the Internet and books are vastly different mediums. There are many different types of readers and you need to be able to provide something for all of them. Some readers will skim articles and others will read every word. You need to cater to both of them. Here's how:
  • Provide headers and section breaks for skimmers.
  • Vary your paragraph lengths. The variety breaks monotony and you definitely don't want monotony. Visual breaks also will not tire readers as easily.
  • Use summary and conclusion paragraphs and sentences throughout your writing, but only when you aren't being redundant.
  • Lists and bullet points help a lot. Pictures do too.
Simplicity

Reduce complexity. Write as simply as you can. I've seen the quote by Antoine de Saint-Exupery many times while reading software articles, but it definitely applies to writing as well: “Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” It's far better to enable your readers to understand your writing than to awe them with pseudo-intellectual jargon.

So how can you write simply?
  • Reduce concepts and ideas into understandable and smaller pieces.
  • Anticipate questions and answer them in advance.
  • Minimize the number of clauses that you use. Run-on sentences should be reworked into smaller sentences. As a general rule, unless you have a comma-separated list, you should look at a rewrite if you have more than two or three commas or semi-colons in your sentence.
  • Don't assume a reader's level of knowledge. Build your writing from the ground up so that you can be sure that you and your reader are speaking the same language. This doesn't mean that you can't write about advanced or very technical subjects, but it helps if you can at least provide a link for beginners to get up to speed.
Style

Style is what separates the technically competent writers from the writers whom everyone enjoys reading. In fact, compelling style can cover over a lot of writing faults. People like humor, personality, controversy, etc. Weave a story into your writing, make it real and applicable to your audience in some way, tell jokes (if you're good at that sort of thing), make a controversial claim; there are many different methods you can use to incorporate your own personality or even a manufactured persona into your writing. This is called your narrative voice.

There are also a few technical aspects that can affect style. Using active voice is usually a good choice over using passive voice. An example of a passive sentence could be, "Mary was driven to the hospital by John." There is nothing wrong with the sentence grammatically, but it isn't very interesting. Consider the same sentence written in an active voice: "John drove Mary to the hospital." It's much more immediate and interesting and there's actually a bit of tension.

Here's the difference between active and passive sentences:
  • Passive - The subject is the recipient of the verb
  • Active - The subject is the actor or doer of the verb
Word choice is another technical component of style. Again, you'll want to choose words that are appropriate to your audience's culture and education. When you've finished writing something, reread what you've written, look for repeated words, and replace them with similar words where possible.
VirtuosiMedia is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit VirtuosiMedia's homepage!
 
Old 09-13-2008, 07:36 PM Re: Active vs Passive Voice
TWD
TWD's Avatar
Webmaster Talker

Posts: 521
Trades: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWD View Post
The point I was making is not about literature but specifically about writing for the web.

Of course the passive voice has its place in novels but on the web people are generally looking for concise "chunks" of information before moving on.
They are also looking for clarity and engagement. Not literary sophistication.

Passive voice sometimes leaves the reader confused about "who" is doing "what" to "whom" and as I mentioned, it sounds impersonal and less conversational than the active voice.
I was looking through one of the "Head Rush" series books yesterday and I found this in their introduction. Thought it was relevant to the topic at hand.

"[We] use a conversational and personalized style. In recent studies, students performed up to 40% better on post-learning tests if the content spoke directly to the reader, using a first-person, conversational style rather than taking a formal tone....your brain is tuned to pay more attention when it believes you`re in a conversation than if it thinks you`re passively listening to a presentation."
TWD is online now
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Reply     « Reply to Active vs Passive Voice
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off





   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.12474 seconds with 13 queries