Content & Writing Tycoon

**mikewilson** · 01-01-2012, 11:53 PM

Hi,

I have heard about lots of tool that offering about 100% unique rewriting contents, had checked some tool and really found working in chase of original. But sentences are looks funny, most of sentences meaningless.

I know some people are using these kind of tools but don't know does it works for them ??

Do you guys using this kind of tool ??? I don't think that Panda will pass this kind of contents

**chrishirst** · 01-02-2012, 06:12 AM

Well after reading your posts, and if you think this

Quote:

But sentences are looks funny, most of sentences meaningless.

about it, ....

...
It must be pretty abysmal!!

**infotech rules** · 01-29-2012, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikewilson

Hi,

I have heard about lots of tool that offering about 100% unique rewriting contents, had checked some tool and really found working in chase of original. But sentences are looks funny, most of sentences meaningless.

I know some people are using these kind of tools but don't know does it works for them ??

Do you guys using this kind of tool ??? I don't think that Panda will pass this kind of contents

There is no such thing that can be a better substitute to human brain. Such tools are waste of time. I tried to spin content few years back but the recreated content was terrible and incomprehensible. It was like if the writer has lost his mind. Always write fresh content for any type of purpose. It will teach you also if you trust me.

**BlissEllison** · 02-06-2012, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikewilson

Hi,

I have heard about lots of tool that offering about 100% unique rewriting contents, had checked some tool and really found working in chase of original. But sentences are looks funny, most of sentences meaningless.

I know some people are using these kind of tools but don't know does it works for them ??

Do you guys using this kind of tool ??? I don't think that Panda will pass this kind of contents

I would advise you to dont use such tools as search engines dont appreciate the technique. However, using some tools makes the content funny, the only option is to proof read once before you publish it.

**VinceWicksWDL** · 02-07-2012, 07:30 AM

If you hire quality providing guys, I'm sure that they'll be able to provide really good content. Just make sure that you find somebody of quality.

**hypernovadesign** · 05:09 PM

I have checked previously such tools and from my experience they help sometimes to find a substitute words which you would not think of, but I dont use it much as I can write my articles quicker and better and they are 100% unique.

**eyebridgeweb** · 07-24-2012, 05:09 AM

No, right now panda is getting more serious about quality content that why i can say it should not be permit this kind of rewriting tools as sometimes these tools make funny changes in d content and the resultant content is not so impressive enough.

So its better for you to not use these tools for your business websites.

Thanks

**atyq** · 07-27-2012, 06:37 PM

@mikewilson
I used to write my articles with these tools, but, one day, my website just became blacklisted of Google SERP. I think that these tools aren't very effective.
Best regards, ATYQ

**Mystical Pippin** · 08-09-2012, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hypernovadesign

I have checked previously such tools and from my experience they help sometimes to find a substitute words which you would not think of.

Use a thesaurus!

**laxmi1102** · 08-11-2012, 04:52 AM

I think using rewriting tools is still relevent. But the article rewriten should be human readable and unique. Just changing synonyms no more works after panda update.

**PrimeOutsourci** · 08-14-2012, 02:41 PM

It is still better to write on your own than the computer doing the writing stuff. Google Panda knows what came from our brain juices and digitally written articles..

**Jim Gillum** · 08-14-2012, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrimeOutsourci

It is still better to write on your own than the computer doing the writing stuff. Google Panda knows what came from our brain juices and digitally written articles..

How does it know that?

You do know it is not alive?...

**hypernovadesign** · 08-17-2012, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atyq

@mikewilson
I used to write my articles with these tools, but, one day, my website just became blacklisted of Google SERP. I think that these tools aren't very effective.
Best regards, ATYQ

Such programs can only be used as an addition to your writing. Programs will never replace a real writer, I hope, but I might be wrong. The same thing people were saying when drum modules kicked off, and now what... they are even better than some drummers!

I do really think Google is able to tell if a particular article was rewritten or not depending on the effort we put on rewriting it, however if we paraphrase the whole sentences, than Google will tell nothing. But, isn’t it better to write a whole article from scratch then?

**irvinemartialart** · 09-10-2012, 07:39 PM

No panda update is more keen in finding duplicate content! unique content will be helpful for improving the ranking of a site in panda.

**Freelander** · 09-14-2012, 08:44 AM

Panda is a very smart update that is using semantics of the language. Not just words and synonyms. This means that google has made it so hard for rewriting that its easier to write uniqu content. Language is a very logical structure and you can easily track rewritten stuff. If you want to change the text so much that the panda wont notice, then its almost always easier to write the text yourself from scratch.

So unique content and unique good links is the way to go from now.

**Iony** · 01-11-2013, 04:27 AM

If you are reffering at spun/spin tools, it's not recommended to use it. Unique articles.!

**carmelel** · 01-19-2013, 09:21 AM

Never use rewriting tools. Even if panda doesn't penalize you (which it will) you will be penalized for it in the future. What many don't understand about Google is, it's not that they keep changing their minds on how to run the search engine, it's that they didn't know how to run it better.

Google plans on penalizing all cheats. If you are not getting penalized now, you will in the future. It's only a matter of time!

**chrishirst** · 01-19-2013, 11:49 AM

Quote:

What many don't understand about Google is, it's not that they keep changing their minds on how to run the search engine, it's that they didn't know how to run it better.

Not necessarily knowing how to run it "better", it's more that their engineers use all the crappy documents that get created to "teach" their indexer the difference between what they want to show their users and what they don't. You do exactly the same thing if you use SpamAssassin, Soft-K9 or MailWasher to label or filter spam messages from your email. Each time you flag a message as spam the Bayesian filters 'learn' a little bit more about what you consider good or bad so it improves. Google just do this on a much bigger scale.

**jimsklansky** · 01-24-2013, 03:25 PM

Panda kind of means something new and different for SEO. As SEOs, for a long time you've been doing the same kind of classic things. You've been building good content, making it accessible to search engines, doing good keyword research, putting those keywords in there, and then trying to get some links to it. But you have not, as SEOs, we never really had to think as much or as broadly about, "What is the experience of this website? Is it creating a brand that people are going to love and share and reward and trust?" Now we kind of have to think about that.

**chrishirst** · 01-24-2013, 05:20 PM

Except that is what ALL so-called SEOs SHOULD have been doing from day one!