Reply
Superior to Dreamweaver?
Old 04-20-2003, 07:46 AM Superior to Dreamweaver?
Junior Talker

Posts: 3
Location: Antigo WI
I've heard alot of good comments regarding Macromedia's Dreamweaver site building tool.

Does anyone here use Site Build It!?, It's a website building tool that includes hosting and allows you to research profitable keywords, run a search engine optimization test, build beautiful graphics, automatically and periodically submit each page individually to the search engines, and it handles everything for you.

There is no required knowledge of HTML code, CGI script or javascript, all of this is handled automatically, all that is required is that you input the text information, (for example, paste in an article) and it is built right before your eyes.

I'm currently researching a few promising ideas using Site Build It's keyword research tool and plan to develop a few mini-sites in the near future, I don't have any experience using Dreamweaver but I have heard alot about it which makes me wonder if it stacks up well to Site Build It!.

So if there are any Site Build It! users out there, let me know,
and to Dreamweaver users, details on Site Build It! can be found at: http://www.smokesoft.net/sitebuildit.html . I'm interested to know if the two products are similar.
__________________
Adam Buhler- smoke@dwave.net
Affiliate Programs Directory-Smokesoft Inc.
"High-profit affiliate solutions"
http://www.smokesoft.net
http://www.smokesoft.net/newsletter.html
Technodummy is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit Technodummy's homepage!
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Reply     « Reply to Superior to Dreamweaver?
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 


Page generated in 0.11212 seconds with 12 queries