Comments on: Texas Court Bans Deeplinking http://www.webmaster-talk.com/blog/23/texas_court_bans_deeplinking Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:19:53 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: clkl http://www.webmaster-talk.com/blog/23/texas_court_bans_deeplinking/comment-page-1#comment-488 clkl Wed, 09 May 2007 19:02:09 +0000 http://www.webmaster-talk.com/blog/23/texas_court_bans_deeplinking#comment-488 Was it linking to another site, or linking in such a way that it seems that the content belongs to the linker's authorship that was prohibited? Was it linking to another site, or linking in such a way that it seems that the content belongs to the linker’s authorship that was prohibited?

]]> By: Webspace http://www.webmaster-talk.com/blog/23/texas_court_bans_deeplinking/comment-page-1#comment-5 Webspace Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:48:49 +0000 http://www.webmaster-talk.com/blog/23/texas_court_bans_deeplinking#comment-5 We all know that refferencing other material via link of bookmark isn't illegal. Text books refference and quote other books and media sources all the time. They making links illegal is like making book illegal. Stupid Pinkertons. We all know that refferencing other material via link of bookmark isn’t illegal. Text books refference and quote other books and media sources all the time. They making links illegal is like making book illegal.

Stupid Pinkertons.

]]>