View Poll Results: Which is Best?
ClickBank 4 100.00%
Plimus 0 0%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
ClickBank VS Plimus -- Which Is Best
Old 10-01-2008, 05:48 PM ClickBank VS Plimus -- Which Is Best
CodrutTurcanu's Avatar
Average Talker

Posts: 16
Name: Codrut Turcanu
Location: Romania
I know most folks heard and maybe use ClickBank, but what about Plimus?

Personally I'm using it as a vendor -- to sell my own stuff.

I used it as an affiliate too -- but prefer ClickBank because they have thousands of unique products...

*** Regarding Plimus:

There are some great digital stuff you could promote that you won't find on CB, for e.g. software tools and programs that make your computer run faster, etc.

If you tested Plimus as an affiliate before, could you share some results?
__________________
Is your Blog Dying? Resuscitate It: Take This Survey Now!
http://www.lazyblogging.com/bcSurvey.html
CodrutTurcanu is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit CodrutTurcanu's homepage!
 
When You Register, These Ads Go Away!
Old 11-18-2008, 06:19 AM Re: ClickBank VS Plimus -- Which Is Best
Skilled Talker

Posts: 56
Name: strauss
ClickBank is the very best credit card processing and affiliate marketing system around.
__________________
I am a satisfied customer of
Cheap Java Tomcat Reseller
Webhosting
strauss is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile
 
Old 11-26-2008, 05:50 AM Re: ClickBank VS Plimus -- Which Is Best
Banned

Posts: 1
Name: Ho Yeow Sin
I uses ClickBank too. It a good way to earn money
yeowsin is offline
Reply With Quote
View Public Profile Visit yeowsin's homepage!
 
Reply     « Reply to ClickBank VS Plimus -- Which Is Best
 

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




   
RSS Feed  Feeds: RSS   JS   XML
RSS Feed  Feeds for this forum: RSS   JS   XML

 



Page generated in 0.09016 seconds with 13 queries